Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Moto G7, getting a global score of 81.2 against 75.2. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though LG V40 ThinQ and the Moto G7 were released only a couple months apart, LG V40 ThinQ is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and more pixels per inch of display. LG V40 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same video definition, the LG V40 ThinQ also has higher video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture.
LG V40 ThinQ features just a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The LG V40 ThinQ is way more expensive than Moto G7, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.