Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much better than Moto G7, having an 85.3 score against 75.2. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has older 11 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a way newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than Moto G7, but it's also much heavier.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a bit worse pixels number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a way bigger display and a way better resolution of 1892 x 2688px. The Moto G7 has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a little better processing power than Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has more RAM memory. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Moto G7, because it has a 48 percent larger battery size.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a little bit better camera than Moto G7, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution back camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a larger camera aperture and higher video frame rates.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G7. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto G7, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.