Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Moto G7's overall score of 75.2. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is way newer than the Moto G7, it is heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Moto G7, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Moto G7 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes greater photos and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Moto G7, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.