Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G7, with a 77.6 score against 75.2. Even though Moto Z3 and Motorola Moto G7 were only released with a few months difference, Moto Z3 is just a little lighter and thinner. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The Moto Z3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto G7. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G7, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a little lower pixel density and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution.
The Moto Z3 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same resolution back camera, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution. The Moto Z3 has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Moto G7, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z3 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto Z3's battery life is just as good as the battery duration in Moto G7.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Moto G7, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.