Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and White | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a general score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than Moto G7's 75.2 overall score. Nubia Red Magic 3S is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier device than the Moto G7. These phones come with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System), so they should give you very similar operating system features.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better looking display than Moto G7, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit larger screen. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a better storage to store more apps and games than Moto G7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a quite better processing power than Moto G7, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a really longer battery performance than Moto G7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior camera than Moto G7, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos, a much better video definition and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G7. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G7, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.