Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Sonic silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G7, with a general score of 76.2 against 75.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the nubia Red Magic 5S has an older 10 version while Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the nubia Red Magic 5S is newer than Motorola Moto G7, it is thicker and incredibly heavier.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a greater camera than Moto G7, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a much better resolution. The Moto G7 has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto G7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G7. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 5S, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G7, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.