Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A21 is a little bit better than the Moto G7, getting a 76.1 score against 75.2. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A21 has older 10 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Although Samsung Galaxy A21 is newer than the Moto G7, it is just a little bit thicker and heavier.
The Moto G7 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A21, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher 1080 x 2270 pixels resolution. The Motorola Moto G7 has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A21, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G7 also has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A21 counts with a bit better processor than Moto G7, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy A21 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Moto G7 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A21, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Moto G7 also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition.
Although Galaxy A21 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G7. If you want to save some money, you can get the Motorola Moto G7, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.