Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the Moto G7, getting a overall score of 85.5 against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy A51 has the same weight and thickness than Moto G7. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A51 features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a greater amount of pixels per inch of display, the Galaxy A51 also has a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A51 has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G7. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a very superior camera than Moto G7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy A51 features superior battery duration than Moto G7, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G7, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.