Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G7, with a 90.8 score against 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a newer phone than the Motorola Moto G7, although it's a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A51 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G has a little sharper display than Moto G7, and although they both have the same count of pixels per screen inch, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a lot better camera than Moto G7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater memory for apps and games than Moto G7, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G7, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.