Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G7, getting a 91.3 score against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto G7's, although it's just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better looking screen than Moto G7, and although they both have the same screen pixels density, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit bigger screen. The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much higher resolution camera. Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G7, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A52 5G features a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.