Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is much better than Moto G7, having a 91.1 score against 75.2. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Galaxy A52s is extremely newer than Moto G7, it is a little heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Galaxy A52s has a bit sharper screen than Moto G7, and although they both have the same display pixel density, the Galaxy A52s also has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger display. The Galaxy A52s features much more storage to install applications and games than Moto G7, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a little better performance than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A52s features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto G7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A52s shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also has a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.