Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G7, with a 75.8 score against 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy A6 design is a little bit lighter and a little thinner than Motorola Moto G7, even though both were only released with a couple months difference. The Moto G7 has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G7 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G7 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A6, because it has a little larger display, a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a lot better 1080 x 2270 resolution. Galaxy A6's camera is just as good as the Moto G7 one, and although the Galaxy A6 has a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and a much better 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality.
Motorola Moto G7 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G7 and Galaxy A6 feature similar batteries performance.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A6 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.