Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto G7's score of 75.2. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy A70 body has the same thickness than the Moto G7, but it is just a little heavier.
Galaxy A70 features a screen that's just as good as the display in Moto G7, because although the Galaxy A70 has a just a bit lower pixels number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A70 has a bit better CPU than Moto G7, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto G7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Moto G7 features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos in low light environments, they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G7. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto G7, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.