Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is better than Motorola Moto G7, getting an 87.5 score against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy A71 is a newer and a bit thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G7, but it is a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G7, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A71 and Moto G7 count with quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy A71 has a little inferior pixel count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G7, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 features a way better battery performance than Moto G7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A71 features a lot better camera than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 also has a way more MP camera.
Although Galaxy A71 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G7. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Moto G7, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.