Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism bricks black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G7's 75.2 global score. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version and Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is newer than Motorola Moto G7, it's a little thicker and a bit heavier.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little faster processor than Moto G7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better screen than Moto G7, because although it has a bit inferior pixel amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G7, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better battery performance than Moto G7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G7. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Moto G7, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.