Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Moto G7, getting a score of 97.6 against 75.2. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Galaxy Fold's body is thinner but heavier than Moto G7, and they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a bit better performance than Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Fold features a display that's just as good as the Moto G7 one, because although the Galaxy Fold has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels.
Galaxy Fold takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Fold also has better video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better battery performance than Moto G7, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G7. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto G7, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.