Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is a bit better than Motorola Moto G7, with a overall score of 78.9 against 75.2. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy M20 has the older 10 version while Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Galaxy M20 design is just a little heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Moto G7.
The Galaxy M20's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Motorola Moto G7, both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. Galaxy M20 has a display that's very similar to the display in Motorola Moto G7, although the Galaxy M20 also has a quite higher number of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit bigger display.
The Moto G7 and the Samsung Galaxy M20 feature really similar memory capacity for apps and games, they have a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB and the same 64 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy M20 has a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto G7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Moto G7 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments and a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.