Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Moto G7, getting a global score of 90.8 against 75.2. Although the Galaxy Note 20 is newer than the Moto G7, it's a little thicker and heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better performance than Moto G7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G7, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy Note 20 takes much better pictures and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels back camera and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Moto G7 features more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a way better battery duration than Moto G7, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Moto G7, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.