Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Moto G7, with a 98.9 score against 75.2. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is newer than Moto G7's, but it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a quite better hardware performance than Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than Moto G7, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a quite larger display and a bit greater pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better camera than Moto G7, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot better video definition. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G7, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior battery performance than Moto G7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto G7, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.