Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G7, having a score of 80.4 against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's body has the same thickness than the Motorola Moto G7, but it's a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G7. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels density. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a 12 megapixels resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a larger aperture.
The Moto G7 features a bit more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G7 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 7% greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto G7, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.