Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than Motorola Moto G7's 75.2 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a just a little lighter phone than Motorola Moto G7, but both are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 has a little sharper screen than Moto G7, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments and faster video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little better battery life than Moto G7, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto G7, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.