Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G7, with a overall score of 77.7 against 75.2. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note3 has the previous 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy Note3's design is just a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G7, although it's a little bit thicker and was released 5 years before.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 features a bit better performance than Moto G7, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster). The Motorola Moto G7 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2270 pixels resolution.
Moto G7 counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G7 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note3 has a little bit better camera than Moto G7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy Note3 also counts with a higher 13 MP resolution back camera.
Galaxy Note3 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Moto G7, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.