Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Moto G7, with a score of 93.6 against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a heavier phone than the Moto G7, but both are equally thin. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a bit larger display, a quite better pixel count per screen inch and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Moto G7, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and higher video frame rate. The Galaxy S10 5G has a greater storage to install applications and games than Moto G7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a very superior battery duration than Moto G7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S10 5G costs a lot more money than the Moto G7, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.