Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than the Moto G7, getting a overall score of 86.3 against 75.2. The Galaxy S10e is a lighter phone than the Moto G7, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels in each display inch and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2280. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e captures a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has better video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 3100mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Moto G7, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.