Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is way better than Moto G7, getting a general score of 94.8 against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy S20's design has the same thickness than Moto G7, but it is a little bit lighter. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the older 13 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM. Galaxy S20 features a much better looking display than Moto G7, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy S20 also has more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Moto G7, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 also has a way higher video quality.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G7, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.