Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is a lot better than Motorola Moto G7, having a general score of 90.8 against 75.2. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S20 FE is a newer cellphone than Motorola Moto G7, although it's a bit heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of pixels in each inch in the screen, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a little larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G7, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little faster processor than Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 FE has a much better battery life than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S20 FE captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, a 12 megapixels camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy S20 FE also has better 60 fps video frame rate.
Although Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G7, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.