Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is better than Moto G7, getting a score of 89.1 against 75.2. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a a little lighter device than Moto G7, but they are equally thin. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has 11 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S21 FE features just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Moto G7 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy S21 FE has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S21 FE also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same aperture and a same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has higher video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G7. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S21 FE, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G7, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.