Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Phantom black and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 Ultra is much better than Moto G7, getting a 98.1 score against 75.2. Even though Galaxy S21 Ultra is newer than the Moto G7, it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S21 Ultra has the previous 11 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a lot better looking display than Moto G7, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a bit larger screen. Galaxy S21 Ultra features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a greater camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a camera with a way better resolution and a lot higher video definition. Moto G7 has a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features a much better battery performance than Moto G7, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S21 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G7. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto G7, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.