Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto G7's 75.2 global score. The Galaxy S22 body is incredibly newer, a little lighter and a little thinner than Motorola Moto G7. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has 13 version while Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S22 features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S22 has a much sharper display than Moto G7, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S22 captures greater photographs and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with way more megapixels. The Moto G7 features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G7. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G7, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.