Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than Moto G7's score of 75.2. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a incredibly newer phone than the Moto G7, although it is thicker and extremely heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than Moto G7, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a just a bit better amount of pixels in each display inch. The Moto G7 counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than Moto G7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G7. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto G7, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.