Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-07 | -- |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a bit better than the Moto G7, with an 82.6 score against 75.2. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S25 construction is much lighter and notably thinner than Moto G7.
Galaxy S25 has an incredibly better display than Moto G7, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S25 also has a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Motorola Moto G7 has a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Moto G7 features more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy S25 features improved battery life than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S25 has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G7. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G7, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.