Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Polycarbonate |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S4 has a general score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than Moto G7's 75.2 general score. Galaxy S4's body has the same thickness than Moto G7, but it is noticeably lighter. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Galaxy S4 has older 4.4.2 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S4 has a brighter display than Moto G7, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display pixel density. Moto G7 has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S4 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser processing cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics processor. The Moto G7 has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy S4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G7 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has a less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture for better photography in low light environments.
Galaxy S4 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.