Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-02-07 | -- |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active has a score of 80.9, which is just a bit better than the Moto G7's 75.2 overall score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S6 Active has 5.0 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy S6 Active is a somewhat thicker but much lighter cellphone than the Moto G7.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with a better processing unit than Moto G7, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processor and a graphics processor. The Galaxy S6 Active has an incredibly better looking display than Moto G7, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Moto G7 has a superior camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a way less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments. Motorola Moto G7 counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Moto G7, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G7, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.