Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G7, getting a 79.5 score against 75.2. Samsung Galaxy S7 is a somewhat lighter device than Motorola Moto G7, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Galaxy S7 has a bit faster processing unit than Moto G7, although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (although faster), they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much better looking display than Moto G7, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Samsung Galaxy S7 captures clearer pictures and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have the same video resolution, a camera in the back with a 12 MP resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos.
Moto G7 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory. Moto G7 and Galaxy S7 have quite similar batteries.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S7 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.