Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-02-07 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge has a general score of 78.1, which is just a bit better than the Moto G7's 75.2 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S7 edge has the older 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Galaxy S7 edge is a lot older than the Moto G7, it's design is a little bit lighter and a bit thinner.
The Galaxy S7 edge features a little bit better looking screen than Moto G7, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Motorola Moto G7 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G7, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM. The Galaxy S7 edge features a bit better camera than Moto G7, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution, the Galaxy S7 edge also has a larger aperture.
Galaxy S7 edge features improved battery life than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 20% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S7 edge is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Moto G7, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.