Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Moto G7, getting a general score of 81 against 75.2. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is newer, but way thicker and a lot heavier than Moto G7.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better screen than Moto G7, because it has a little larger screen, a just a bit higher pixel count per screen inch and a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Moto G7 and Galaxy XCover Pro feature extremely similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments and a much more MP camera.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7. If you want to save some money, you can get the Moto G7, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.