Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is better than Moto G7's global score of 75.2. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit heavier than Moto G7, it's just a little thinner and newer.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution, a just a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better camera than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate. Galaxy Z Flip features a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Moto G7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Moto G7, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto G7, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.