Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than the Moto G7, getting a score of 85.6 against 75.2. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version and Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is extremely newer and thinner, but just a little heavier than Moto G7.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a just a bit greater count of pixels in each inch in the display, a little bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution.
Moto G7 counts with a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little longer battery life than Moto G7, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G7 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have the same resolution camera and a same size aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G7. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G7, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.