Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Motorola Moto G7, getting a 92.3 score against 75.2. Even though Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G7, it's a bit thinner and also newer. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better looking display than Moto G7, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a just a bit higher screen pixels density. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better performing CPU than Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same resolution back camera and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto G7, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G7. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto G7, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.