Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Moto G7, having a 94.6 score against 75.2. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much heavier than the Moto G7, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better display than Moto G7, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with more storage to install games and applications than Moto G7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better performance than Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery performance than Moto G7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has faster video frame rates.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G7, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.