Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v is just a bit better than the Moto G7, with a 78.8 score against 75.2. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia Z4v has an older 5.1 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Although the Xperia Z4v is incredibly older and just a little thicker than the Moto G7, it's design is still just a little bit lighter.
The Sony Xperia Z4v has just a bit better processing power than Moto G7, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a graphics processing unit. Sony Xperia Z4v has a much better screen than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per screen inch.
The Xperia Z4v has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Moto G7 has a superior storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Sony Xperia Z4v has a battery lifetime that's very similar to the battery duration in Motorola Moto G7.
Although Xperia Z4v is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Xperia Z4v, else you can save some money and get the Moto G7, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.