Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G71 5G is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, having an 82.9 score against 81. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Moto G71 5G has the older 11 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Moto G71 5G's construction is way newer, but just a bit thicker and just a little heavier than the LG G7 ThinQ.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G71 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a better looking display than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better pixel amount per screen inch.
The Motorola Moto G71 5G has a slightly better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also counts with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto G71 5G counts with a much better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.