Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G71 5G has a score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ's general score of 82.5. The Moto G71 5G body is notably newer than the LG V30S ThinQ's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Moto G71 5G has an older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G71 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
Moto G71 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G71 5G also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G71 5G has a much better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.