Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Moto G71 5G's score of 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Moto G71 5G, even though it was released many years before. Galaxy A50 features a screen that's just as good as the display in Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although the Galaxy A50 has a bit lower pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a display of the same size.
Galaxy A50 features much more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 has a processing unit that is very similar to Moto G71 5G's CPU, and although the Galaxy A50 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Moto G71 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto G71 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and better video frame rates.
Moto G71 5G has improved battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.