Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than the Moto G71 5G's general score of 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is an older cellphone than Moto G71 5G, but Samsung was able to make it a bit lighter and a little thinner. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and Moto G71 5G has Android 11.
Galaxy A50s counts with a screen that is just as good as Motorola Moto G71 5G's screen, and although the Galaxy A50s has a just a little worse pixel density and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a display of the same size. Galaxy A50s features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G71 5G. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A50s features just a bit better camera than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a less megapixels back-facing camera and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Motorola Moto G71 5G features improved battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.