Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is slightly better than the Moto G71 5G, with a 90.8 score against 82.9. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G construction is older, a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the Moto G71 5G.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and Moto G71 5G have very similar processing units, both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. Moto G71 5G and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G both count with very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a just a little worse amount of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
Galaxy A51 5G takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a lesser MP back facing camera and a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution. The Galaxy A51 5G features a superior storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G71 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.