Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Moto G71 5G, getting a 92.9 score against 82.9. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a little bit heavier cellphone than the Moto G71 5G, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Moto G71 5G has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a display that is just as good as the Moto G71 5G one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a just a bit lower screen density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better performance than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior camera than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a much better video resolution.
The Moto G71 5G counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.