Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is slightly better than the Moto G71 5G's 82.9 general score. The Galaxy Note 20 construction has the same thickness than the Moto G71 5G, but it's just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a screen that is very similar to the display in Moto G71 5G, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little lower amount of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little larger display.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 counts with as much storage to store more apps and games as the Motorola Moto G71 5G, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The Moto G71 5G has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20's camera is very similar to the Moto G71 5G one, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a much less MP back-facing camera, and they both have the same camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.