Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is better than the Motorola Moto G71 5G's score of 82.9. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G71 5G has Android 11 version, giving a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older and heavier phone than the Motorola Moto G71 5G, but Samsung managed to build it just a bit thinner anyway.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better processing unit than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G71 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.