Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G71 5G has a global score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's score of 81.2. Motorola Moto G71 5G is a just a bit heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, but they have the same thickness. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but Motorola Moto G71 5G has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy Note 3 and Moto G71 5G feature quite similar processors, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has a smaller amount of RAM and less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional GPU. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G71 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a just a bit lower pixels density.
The Moto G71 5G takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video quality, the Moto G71 5G also has higher video frame rate, a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G71 5G has a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G71 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.